As I have a tendency to do, I'm currently reading about 4-5 books at the same time, depending on my mood. One of these is Starting Point: 1979-1996
And the key is in the pacing...
"There's a term that a certain studio executive used when he sensed a movie was starting to slow down. He'd say, "I'm going for popcorn." He felt that unless a movie raced nonstop to its conclusion, an audience would inevitably lose interest. I totally disagree with him. Things don't need to be faster all the time.
(...)
The co-director on the Toy Story 2 movie was Lee Unkrich--he was also the editor for all of our films. I turned Lee on to Miyazaki-san's films, and we've had many discussions about how Miyazaki-san is a master of pacing. There are certain moments in a film you cannot rush through It's important to allow the audience to reflect on what's happening on the screen.

I remember reading reviews of Toy Story 2 when it was first released. Many critics mentioned that it had an Toy Story's success. You need that component to reflect pathos, sadness--all those heartfelt emotions. Like I've said before, you just can't rush those things."
emotional depth lacking in most animated films. In fact, they were surprised to discover that a cartoon could deliver such depth. I am very proud of that. Most of the critics didn't specifically mention the movie's pacing, but to me that was the key to
I believe this is an important point, not just in animation, but in any story telling venture. Something I need to remind myself of it too, since I have a tendency to wonder if my books are getting boring whenever I have no-action sequences. Instead, I should use these slower moments to elevate the emotional aspects of my characters.








